Thursday, January 21, 2010

Harper's Articles- Sarah

The articles that I read in Harper's magazine were all very different. In a way they all complimented each other. There was one that was a purely entertaining story called "Vallandigham." This was a narrative that was not informative nor intellectual, simply romantic. In contrast, the "Monthly Current Events" was very politically informative and factual. It contained no story and simply and description of any recent activity that fell under the political spectrum in a manner so that anyone could read it. There were articles that I felt were not for everyone, though. Shakespeare and Hollingshed was analytical of Shakespeare's writing in comparison to a past writer; which would have required some background knowledge of Shakespeare. To round it all off, there were two poems included. "The Three Tells" was a tall tale, probably an old legend. It was mainly entertaining to read, but was somewhat intellectual. The Havelock was a poem that had to be read closely in order to see that it was political and about the Revolutionary War.

I thought some of the stories were interesting and some were pretty tedious to read. "Vallandigham was entertaining, but it dragged on too long for a magazine; which could be a personal bias since I am used to modern magazines. Some of the other articles would only be interesting to people who were interested in the specific subject that they addressed. The one with Shakespeare would only be interesting to someone who had an interest in Shakespeare's writing. I would probably read this magazine, but only certain parts. I thought the political article that gave summary of current events was very interesting and useful.

1 comment:

  1. While reading Harper's magazine I also did not see a large correlation between articles. The topics chosen for the articles seemed almost completely random to me and almost tried to cover too many interests. Also, although the articles were well written, I completely agree that some of the articles were very tedious to read and took way too long to read for a magazine article. However, I think part of this thinking can be attributed to the differences between our society today and the society the magazines were being published in. Also, I can see how the magazine would appeal to a wide variety of people, but for the most part, the topics are so random and unrelated and change each issue that I think it would almost be a toss up as to whether a specific person would enjoy the latest edition of the magazine.

    ReplyDelete